On 11/13/2009, Interplay Entertainment Corp. announced that they will be unable to file their next 10-Q by the deadline required by the SEC.

On October 16, 2009, Interplay Entertainment Corp. answered the lawsuit filed by Bethesda Softworks LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on September 8, 2009. In conjunction with its Answer, Interplay asserted Counter-Claims against Bethesda seeking affirmative relief, including for Breach of Contract, Declaratory Judgment, and other relief. Interplay alleges Bethesda breached the terms of Asset Purchase Agreement related to the sale of the FALLOUT intellectual property to Bethesda. Interplay's counter-suit alleges that Bethesda interfered with Interplay's business, including distribution of the previously released FALLOUT, FALLOUT 2, and FALLOUT Tactics games, by attempting to terminate Interplay's distribution rights, among other acts. Interplay asks the Court to decide whether Bethesda's attempt to terminate Interplay's rights under the Asset Purchase Agreement results in nullification of the entire contract such that the Parties should be returned to the status quo under their former Exclusive Licensing Agreement. If the Exclusive Licensing Agreement is restored, Bethesda may owe royalties based upon sales of its FALLOUT 3 title. Interplay also seeks a declaration from the Court that it has not infringed upon the FALLOUT mark and that it has satisfied the terms of a Trademark Licensing Agreement it signed with Bethesda related to Interplay's production of a massively-multiplayer online game. For its part, Bethesda seeks to cancel the Trademark License Agreement, which conditionally allows Interplay to use the FALLOUT brand in conjunction with its currently-in-production massively multiplayer online game. Bethesda claims that Interplay breached the trademark license agreement because it allegedly failed to commence full scale development and satisfy a funding requirement within a specified time frame. Bethesda also seeks to terminate Interplay's rights with respect to Interplay's distribution of the FALLOUT back catalog of games. Interplay disputes these allegations. Although the potential damages are currently unknown, if Bethesda ultimately prevails, Bethesda could obtain a damages award and cancel the trademark license agreement. Interplay could lose its license to use the FALLOUT brand with respect to its massively multiplayer online game, and also its right to distribute the pre-existing FALLOUT titles.

On September 8, 2009 Bethesda Softworks LLC filed a complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Preliminary Injunction and Other Relief against Interplay Entertainment Corp. The complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Bethesda seeks to cancel the trademark license agreement that Bethesda and Interplay entered into on April 4, 2007, which conditionally allows Interplay to use the FALLOUT(R) brand in conjunction with its currently-in-production massively multiplayer online game. Bethesda claims that Interplay breached the trademark license agreement because it allegedly failed to commence full scale development and satisfy a funding requirement within a specified time frame. Bethesda also seeks to terminate Interplay's rights with respect to the previously released FALLOUT(R), FALLOUT(R) 2, and FALLOUT(R) Tactics games. Interplay adamantly disputes these claims. Although the potential damages are currently unknown, if Bethesda ultimately prevails, Bethesda could obtain damages and cancel the trademark license agreement, Interplay could lose its license to use the FALLOUT(R) brand with respect to its massively multiplayer online game and/or its license to distribute the back catalog FALLOUT(R) titles. Interplay has retained The Gersh Law Firm to defend its rights and to redress damages caused by Bethesda.